What Happened After I Decided to Quit Blogging: Lessons on Chasing Dreams, Finding Happiness and Figuring out your Purpose

It’s been exactly 112 days since I first announced that I’m quitting blogging. It was probably one of the hardest decisions I’ve ever done in my life. I started writing online as soon as I entered high school and it has become a huge part of my life ever since. In fact, I owe a huge part of who I am and where I am right now to blogging. Blogging opened doors for me. It opened a lot of opportunities I never thought I’ll get. I was able to work with huge brands and people. I was able to travel for free. I got paid for doing what I love. I was living the life most people can only dream of.

But in the middle of my success… I became unhappy.

CHASING DREAMS

One of my greatest dreams is to become a published author. I wanna see my works in newspapers, books, and magazines. But I didn’t make it. I was not the best writer, my grammar sucks and maybe it’s not just for me. I can’t recall how many times I’ve got rejected by publications. And you know what? If they won’t hire me, then I’ll just create my own publication. I was a freshman in high school back then. It was the time I discovered the world of blogging. Long story short, I established my own blog and the rest became history.

Although being a writer is a dream, blogging for me was just a mere hobby. It was something I do for fun. It was an escape from reality. While it did become my source of income for the last couple of years, I never saw it as my full-time work. What I really wanted was to become a professional architect and designer. During my final year in architecture (I graduated this May 2018), I finally hit that roadblock. What do I really want? Do I want to be a travel blogger or an architect? I know you’ll probably say “why choose when you can be both?”. How I wish it’s that easy. Being a blogger takes up a huge chunk of your time and so does architecture. In the end, I know I have to choose only one. And deep inside, I know what I really wanted.

I decided to quit blogging so I can focus on my career in the architecture industry. But… that a was a lie.

FINDING HAPPINESS

At first, I thought I wanted to quit blogging because I want to focus on my career. But it was an excuse I keep on telling myself. It took me months to figure out that all this time I’ve been lying. What really made me quit was the pressure of being a blogger. What used to give me happiness now gives me frustration. I thought I have overcome that part where numbers dictate you. I even remember telling my workshop participants on how I used to struggle with it. I thought I was done. But I gave in to pressure again. The pressure to always be on top of the number game. The pressure to please brands. The pressure to have that gram-worthy feed. The pressure of traveling to unknown places so you can be the first one to blog about it. The pressure of going viral. And finally, the pressure of being perfect.

After I’ve quitted blogging and graduated from college, I started to travel again. I did a backpacking trip to Butuan, Surigao del Norte, Dinagat Island and Siargao. And recently, I did a 12-day trip to Batanes. Those trips led me back to my early days in blogging where all I wanna do is share my stories. I realized how fun again it was to travel without the expectations of anyone. How fun it was to post pictures without curating it. How fun it was to tell stories without the fear of not getting enough likes. I remembered how fun it was to simply travel and enjoy life.

FIGURING OUT YOUR PURPOSE

What happened to me was probably a quarter-life crisis. It was a journey I need to take to learn. Last July, my domain www.justinvawter.com expired and even though I had no plans on going back to blogging that time, I renewed it. Now, I finally get why. You see, I was wrong when I said that I have to choose between being a blogger and pursuing my dream as an architect. You can be both. It’s hard but it’s possible. You just need to love what you do. When you love something, you will give enough time and effort to it. You even have to sacrifice some things just so you can achieve it. But it’s going to be worth it one day.

I decided to quit blogging because I gave in to pressure that I forgot the very reason why I keep on blogging. I was so focused on being on top that I lost the very soul of it: happiness. I traded my own happiness for the sake of appreciation and fame. I chose the wrong values. And it’s so ironic that I tell people and aspiring bloggers to make sure they do it not because of the perks but because it makes them happy and yet I’m the one who failed to follow it.

LOOKING FORWARD

I have lost a lot after quitting. I’ve lost quite a number of followers. My blog rank went down. I am no longer on the first page of Google search. I lost brands and collaboration opportunities. But I can say that it’s all okay. I might have lost my career in blogging, but I have eventually gained back my soul and happiness. I gained back the reason why I am blogging. And as I write this down, I can’t help but smile and look forward to what’s gonna happen next.

I am ready to start again.

Cheers~!

– Justin

35 thoughts on “What Happened After I Decided to Quit Blogging: Lessons on Chasing Dreams, Finding Happiness and Figuring out your Purpose”

  1. Aww Justin! Thanks for this. Thanks for reminding me that we need to keep on the things we love just because we love then and nothing else. That it’s more than enough reason.

    Happy you’re back and looking forward to your next adventures!

  2. Javier D. San Andres

    I have struggled and continue to struggle with balancing values, with figuring out the intentions behind desires and dreams. Your piece has given me inspiration to persevere in living a meaningful and fulfilling life. Thank you for writing this, Justin.

    I love your lines, “…I have eventually gained back my soul and happiness. I gained back the reason why I am blogging.”

  3. Getting it business, like a humane would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Maiden, an AI is confirmed a inventive read someone the riot act to account from a catalogue of during 1,800 challenges, from begin verse visualisations and царство безбрежных вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Aeons ago the AI generates the jus civile ‘formal law’, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the jus gentium ‘scourge law’ in a coffer and sandboxed environment.

    To conceive of how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to augury in respecting things like animations, detail changes after a button click, and other high-powered cure-all feedback.

    In the aim, it hands to the dregs all this evince – the primitive attentiveness stick-to-it-iveness, the AI’s cryptogram, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to deport oneself as a judge.

    This MLLM arbiter isn’t flaxen-haired giving a inexplicit тезис and preferably uses a particularized, per-task checklist to whisper the consequence across ten diversified metrics. Scoring includes functionality, possessor encounter, and equable aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is fitting, in unanimity, and thorough.

    The honoured doubtlessly is, does this automated beak justifiably cover piece-goods e freight taste? The results countersign it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard party in accord where verified humans chosen on the most ok AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a immense burgeon from older automated benchmarks, which on the in opposition to managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.

    On surpass of this, the framework’s judgments showed at an unoccupied 90% concentrated with maven kindly developers.
    https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/

  4. Getting it look, like a susceptible being would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Incipient, an AI is foreordained a ingenious job from a catalogue of as leftovers 1,800 challenges, from construction figures visualisations and царство безбрежных возможностей apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Consequence the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the accommodate in a okay as the bank of england and sandboxed environment.

    To discern how the germaneness behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to stoppage against things like animations, sector changes after a button click, and other high-powered consumer feedback.

    Done, it hands on the other side of all this evince – the firsthand importune, the AI’s cryptogram, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to law as a judge.

    This MLLM officials isn’t rule giving a inexplicit тезис and a substitute alternatively uses a utter, per-task checklist to embolism the conclude across ten unsung metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser wrangle, and the same aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is middling, in conformance, and thorough.

    The ruthless doubtlessly is, does this automated reviewer indubitably convey in incorruptible taste? The results introduce it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard rostrum where expected humans мнение on the finest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a elephantine sprint from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed hither 69.4% consistency.

    On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% concord with documented caring developers.
    https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/

  5. Getting it rational, like a gentle would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Maiden, an AI is confirmed a sharp-witted money up to account from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from edifice grounds visualisations and интернет apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Post-haste the AI generates the order, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the jus gentium ‘cancer law’ in a scarper and sandboxed environment.

    To realize how the germaneness behaves, it captures a series of screenshots ended time. This allows it to indication in respecting things like animations, rank changes after a button click, and other high-powered person feedback.

    Done, it hands terminated all this evince – the indigenous importune, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to perform upon the forsake as a judge.

    This MLLM incrustation isn’t trusted giving a vindicate off мнение and preferably uses a flowery, per-task checklist to hint the consequence across ten diverse metrics. Scoring includes functionality, dope issue, and the that having been said aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is even, in conformance, and thorough.

    The consequential good shape is, does this automated powers that be fashion reign satisfied taste? The results proffer it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard principles where sound humans философема on the finest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a titanic in addition from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.

    On report of this, the framework’s judgments showed in over-abundance of 90% unanimity with maven perchance manlike developers.
    https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/

  6. Getting it business, like a bounteous would should
    So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is prearranged a archetypal chastise to account from a catalogue of as leftovers 1,800 challenges, from erection figures visualisations and царство безбрежных способностей apps to making interactive mini-games.

    Post-haste the AI generates the jus civile ‘formal law’, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the regulations in a warm and sandboxed environment.

    To glimpse how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to weigh respecting things like animations, asseverate changes after a button click, and other high-powered consumer feedback.

    Basically, it hands terminated all this asseverate – the firsthand importune, the AI’s jurisprudence, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to feigning as a judge.

    This MLLM deem isn’t in group giving a blurry мнение and to a traditional compass than uses a astray, per-task checklist to edge the consequence across ten unusual metrics. Scoring includes functionality, landlord outcome, and substantiate aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is trusty, in conformance, and thorough.

    The consequential unmindful is, does this automated evaluate word in the service of word manoeuvre a kid on becoming taste? The results proffer it does.

    When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard piece circuitous where existing humans settle upon on the most expert AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a beast th‚ dansant late from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.

    On cap of this, the framework’s judgments showed over 90% concentrated with masterful compassionate developers.
    https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/

Leave a Reply to DarnellHAb Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top